Julian Assange goes to School / When you expose too much truth, get ready for the third degree
PUBLICITY FOR GOVERNMENTAL WRONGDOING
Julian Assasnge run the WikiLeaks website. "WikiLeaks deeply angered U.S. officials by beginning to publish its trove of 250,000 secret U.S. diplomatic cables". (Cassandra Vinograd, Julian Assange back in court to fight for bail, AP, 16 Dec 2010)
And what did the "U.S. Officials" do about this? Did they claim the cables were fabricated?
No. This was the real deal.
CORRUPT GOVERNMENT FIGHTS BACK
So President Obama "sent his spokesperson Robert Gibbs out to discredit the founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange" reference
Assange was publishing all sorts of true, but extremely unflattering information about the nuts and bolts of Jewish President Barack Obama's government.
Maybe the boys could publish some very unflattering information about Julian Assange.
PUBLICITY FOR SEXUAL ADVENTURER
While Assange is a real expert with the internet and publicity, he can't keep his pecker in his pants. And so they decided to bait him.
THE WILLING, NO, MAKE THAT EAGER, "VICTIM"
"One of the women said in her statement to police that she was obsessed with meeting the tall, wiry man she had come to see as a hero of free speech — "interesting, brave and admirable."" (Malin Rising, Assange rape case spotlights Sweden's liberal laws, AP, 8 Dec 2010)
BAITING THE HOOK
"For two weeks after seeing an Assange TV interview, the 27-year-old woman devoured news reports about him. Then one night, she Googled his name and learned he was giving a lecture in Sweden on Aug. 14.
The woman contacted the organizers and offered to do chores if she were allowed to attend. She turned up in a bright pink sweater and sat in the front row — looking out of place amid a sea of journalists in somber suits. The ice was broken when she agreed to buy a cable for Assange's computer.
She was invited to a post-lecture dinner, she said, and seated next to Assange. They flirted, she told police: At one point Assange hand-fed her cheese and bread. The police report says she found it "flattering."
"VICTIM" BRINGS "PREDATOR" INTO HER BED
She and Assange went to the movies, where she said they kissed. Two days later she brought him home." (Malin Rising, Assange rape case spotlights Sweden's liberal laws, AP, 8 Dec 2010)
The second "victim" had also invited Assange into her bed. They were sleeping together. "In a London court Tuesday, a lawyer accused Assange of having unprotected sex with the woman while she was asleep.
Afterward, he stayed in the apartment for nearly a week." (Malin Rising, Assange rape case spotlights Sweden's liberal laws, AP, 8 Dec 2010)
PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE LIES
Since there is no allegation that the woman was drugged, there's no way Assange could have had sex with her while she was asleep. She would wake up.
And if there had been a nasty, forceful rape, she would have asked Assange to leave right away. But he stayed for another week in the apartment.
So why would "the boys" even bring such weak accusations?
WHEN MERE ACCUSATIONS ARE ENOUGH FOR A SMEAR
"Assange's Swedish lawyer, Bjorn Hurtig, claims the courts are stacked against defendants 
in sex cases and Assange essentially has to prove he is innocent." (Malin Rising, Assange rape case spotlights Sweden's liberal laws, AP, 8 Dec 2010)
The rape allegations may not stick: "despite having the highest rate of reported sex offenses among 24 European countries — 47 per 100,000 citizens — Sweden sees only 10 percent of those cases lead to convictions, a 2009 European Commission-funded study found." (Malin Rising, Assange rape case spotlights Sweden's liberal laws, AP, 8 Dec 2010)
But everyone has had a chance to see how the American government does business: "he sent his spokesperson Robert Gibbs out to discredit the founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange". (Tom Hayden, Despite WikiLeaks Revelations, Congress Votes for War Funding, The Nation, 28 Jul 2010)
"American"?
This isn't the first time these people have been troubled by a "tall, wiry man" who was "a hero of free speech". (as per Malin Rising, Assange rape case spotlights Sweden's liberal laws, AP, 8 Dec 2010)
THEY WERE LOOKING TO GET SOME DIRT ON THE TALL MAN
BUT WEREN'T THERE THOSE TWO WOMEN IN SWEDEN
56For many bare false witness against him, but their witness agreed not together.
57And there arose certain, and bare false witness against him, saying,
58We heard him say, I will destroy this temple that is made with hands, and within three days I will build another made without hands.
59But neither so did their witness agree together. (Mark 14, Holy Bible)
BUT ISN'T IT JUST FOR AN INTERROGATION, AND NOT A FULL CRUCIFIXION?
But supposedly they just want to interrogate him?
"A Swedish prosecutor has asked for a court order to detain WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange for questioning on suspicions of rape, sexual molestation and unlawful coercion.
Director of Public Persecution Marianne Ny said Thursday the reason for the request is that investigators have not been able to bring Assange in for an interrogation." (Sweden seeks to detain Assange in rape case, AP, 18 Nov 2010)
And what do these interrogations look like?
WHEN WITNESSES DON'T WORK OUT
64Ye have heard the blasphemy: what think ye? And they all condemned him to be guilty of death.
65And some began to spit on him, and to cover his face, and to buffet him, and to say unto him, Prophesy: and the servants did strike him with the palms of their hands. (Mark 14, Holy Bible)
Ah, that kind of interrogation. Its sounds just like a page out of the "secret prison program": "1. The Attention Grab: The interrogator forcefully grabs the shirt front of the prisoner and shakes him.
2. Attention Slap: An open-handed slap aimed at causing pain and triggering fear.”
(Brian Ross, Richard Esposito, CIA’s Harsh Interrogation Techniques Described – Sources Say Agency’s Tactics Lead to Questionable Confessions, Sometimes to Death, ABC, 18 Nov 2005)
THEY DON'T HAVE ENOUGH
If the "Swedish" prosecutors had enough to charge Assange, they would have done so long ago.
They don't. And so they need more.
BUT KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT
Because the outcome has already been determined: "what think ye? And they all condemned him to be guilty of death." (Mark 14:64, Holy Bible)
And so they want him as a prisoner. In a facility where they can slap him. And where they keep the records of what was said -- or what they wish was said.
And if Assange says anything remotely like what they want to hear (or their recordtaker claims he did), well, "Where's that cross?"
